North Georgia College & State University Faculty Senate
Meeting:
Minutes for Thursday, April 10, 2003
Call to Order
At 12:31 P.M., C.E.O. Jimmy Woods called
the April 10, 2003 meeting of the NGCSU Faculty Senate to order.
Senators
in Attendance: Dlynn Armstrong-Williams, Kim Benton, V.P.A.A. Phil
Buckhiester, Noel Campbell, Carl Cavalli, Elizabeth Combier, Barry Friedman,
Robert Fuller, Anne Gaillard, President Nathaniel Hansford, Kristi Hislope,
Scot Irwin, Aaron Lu, D. Brian Mann, C. Michael Powell, Lindsey Reeves,
Harriette Richard, Andy Schaffer, Sally Weidmann, C.E.O. Jimmy Woods
Newly
Elected Senators in Attendance: Catherine Chastain, Elizabeth Lewis,
David Morris, Greta Olsen
Senators
Excused: Jack Broman, Ahmad Ghafarian, Bud Reiselt, Jeff Sommers, Ann
Stucke, Ann Sumners
Newly
Elected Senators Excused: Mariana Pomphile
Senators
Absent: Kaye Biddy, Chris Dare, Georgia Mann, Alice Sampson, Dan Thompson
Newly
Elected Senators Absent: Kevin Mace, Steve Smith
Guests:
Kim Melton, Linda Roberts-Betsch
March 13, 2003 Minutes
C.E.O.
Jimmy Woods submitted the minutes of the March 13th meeting
for approval and called for any additions or corrections. There being none,
Sally Wiedmann moved to accept the minutes. Harriette Richard
seconded, and the minutes were approved with no revisions.
President's Report: Dr. Nathaniel Hansford
The
President began with a budget update. He explained that the `04 budget
is still up in the air and added that the `03 budget is in effect without
additional cuts. The Governor could add cuts, Hansford said, but
it's not likely. The `04 budget is in process, he continued; the House
has approved it, while the Senate has not done so yet. We will have to
see about whether or not taxes are raised, but this, said Hansford,
probably wouldn't happen without a special session. If there is no tax
increase this year, he explained, there would be worse cuts next year.
Concluding his budget remarks, he said that there will be a President’s
meeting to discuss a possible tuition increase, which he sees as ideal
at the rate of 5%. He then asked for questions.
Hansford
then moved to the search for new head basketball coach, explaining that
we have qualified candidates interested, and that the search is moving
forward. The Search Committee is comprised of Tom Temples (Chair), Mark
Spraker, Jason Pruitt, Mark Howarth, Kathy Sisk, Mac McConnell, and Cory
Duvall.
C.E.O.’s Report and Election of New Officers: Dr. Jimmy Woods
Woods
offered his thanks to the departing senators, his welcome to the new
senators, and his (tongue-in-cheek?) congratulations to the reelected senators.
He then moved on to the election of officers for 2003-2004.
Elections:
Woods told the assembled that he had been renominated as C.E.O. and
that he had no other nominations. Opening the floor for such, none were
forthcoming. Barry Friedman moved that Woods be named C.E.O.
in a unanimous ballot, and Sally Wiedmann seconded. The motion (and
thus Woods' election) carried forthwith.
Moving
to the election of a Secretary, Brian Mann explained that
he had not been reelected to the Senate and thus could not serve. Woods
then opened the floor for nominations. Elizabeth Combier was
nominated by Barry Friedman. Combier asked what the duties are,
and Mann explained them. Michael Powell moved to close the
nominations, and Scot Irwin seconded. Barry Friedman then
offered a resolution to thank Mann for his service as secretary,
and Kristi Hislope seconded.
Committee on Committees Report: Dr. Kim Melton
Melton
cited information on committee appointments from a handout that was given
to Senate Executives (cf. Senate Archives). She listed the C.O.C members
and explained that their goals were to fill committees based on preferences,
provide broad representation across departments, provide continuity from
current to upcoming committee rosters, and be equitable in distribution
of assignments. There were, she explained, 202 requests for feedback distributed
and 91 replies. 88 of these are on committee. 69% of them were appointed
to their first choice. Only 3 people are on unrequested committees, all
due to procedural exigencies. All but 1 committee has at least 1 member
continuing on the committee. After a few more facts were cited, Melton
enjoyed the unanimous acceptance of her report.
Suggested Changes to the Faculty Handbook: A.V.P.A.A. Dr. Linda Roberts-Betsch
Putting
her suggested changes up for considerations on the overhead, she explained
that they had to do with sections 4.6 (post-tenure review) and 4.7 (format
for the dossiers). They had to do with wording that caused procedural problems,
she said, and comprise adding a referral to section 4.7 for the CV format
(4.7: section 8, regarding the written analysis of evaluations and copies
of the evaluations). Also, she proposed taking #8 and moving it to the
documentation section from the C.V. section because it doesn’t apply to
post-tenure review (as it does for tenure).
Scott
Irwin asked for clarification on whether it was a proposal for a change
in content or in format. Consensus ensued that it doesn’t, in fact, imply
a change of content. Scott Irwin moved to accept the changes and
Dlynn Armstrong-Williams seconded.
Barry
Friedman suggested, as a friendly amendment, that the instructions
should say that student evaluations are required. Clarifications on what’s
required for the dossier followed. Robert Fuller postulated that
we could we could add parenthetical comments to each item clarifying whether
it is required or not. Elizabeth Combier urged consistency in listing
what is required and what is suggested. Armstrong-Williams agreed.
Andy Stucke suggested that only required items be marked as "required."
Scott Irwin suggested that #3 be marked as required, but that #'s
4, 5, & 6 be left open.
Combier
asked what we should do when we’re compiling the dossier (again supporting
consistency of labeling). Barry Friedman moved to amend the proposal
by adding parenthetical statements as to what is "suggested." Linda
Roberts-Betsch suggested specifying these details in the directions
rather than in the item list. Barry Friedman moved as above, Dlynn
Armstrong-Williams asked if we could vote on motion, then work on items
#'s 4, 5, and 6.
Woods
said yes and called for a vote on the current motion, which carried .Barry
Friedman then moved that #'s 4, 5, and 6 be marked as "suggested,"
not "required." Elizabeth Combier seconded. V.P.A.A. Phil Buckhiester
asked for clarification, remarking that he found it strange that all things
should be only "suggested." Sally Wiedmann added that performance
evaluations are yearly, and committees look at overall picture. Scott
Irwin moved to make #'s 4 & 5 as "required", but leave #6 marked
as "suggested." Dlynn Armstrong-Williams seconded. Barry Friedman
agreed to the amendment, leaving Lindsay Reeves wondering why and
item would only be "suggested." Buckhiester replied that it was
because he wanted to have a mechanism to move forward in case an item is
not available (as in letters of support). The motion carried.
Childcare Committee Report & Recommendations: Dr. D. Brian Mann (this
agenda item reported by Elizabeth Combier)
Dr. Mann distributed handouts on his report. He reminded the Senate
of the resolution passed last March for childcare facility report. Information
is available on the N drive as well.
First part: to decide to establish
a facility on campus with our resources. He invited those from past initiatives
to attend and to offer information. Col. Lord and Dr. Gannaway also came.
Several kinds of care exist; baby care – labor intensive, etc. There are
different staff and requirements for each, and regulations exist as needs
to separate age groups. Faculty should, some felt, be able to use kids
in research. Dr. Gannaway said that is not their interest for education
dept., as programmatic needs do not correspond to those for the care of
children under 5 years of age. A lab school not desired. Surveys
in 1999 and 2003 show that most people at the college need childcare in
the lower age group; especially students.
Financial resources are also an issue. To build a facility is unlikely;
no resources or conversions available. Supplies, utilities, etc. needs
include personnel, supervisory people for every age group, staff in each
room for each age group. State standards apply. Record-keeping also.
In 1999, Dr. Kirk Heriot offered a cost-analysis of $3,554 per week,
which
Mann considers to be an underestimate. There are professional
services available: 8 providers in the area. Thos for ages 0-2 are in short
supply, but available. There are concerns with appearing as competition
to these businesses. We cannot offer such services as benefits to students
& employees. 102 replies on surveys sent out in 1999. 87 responses
this year. So, student body does not have a pressing need for services
of this kind.
-
Recommendation 1: not to pursue the idea of an on-campus facility.
-
Recommendation 2: Team up with private providers for part-time care.
Most of our students cannot afford to pay the full week price for part-time
care.
The
committee talked to providers. It invited Darlene Bearinger to come from
a private facility. She is agreeable to the idea. She can provide the service
from birth to 4 or 5 years old. Will offer 20 spaces to us on a part-time
basis as a trial run experiment. Contract at the beginning of the semester
for so many hours. Writing proposal and is forthcoming. Similar relationships
with other providers are possible. So, investigate further with private
provider. According to Mann, Gerald Lord stated that to favor one
provider over another is not a problem. We will act as a referral agency.
In Gainesville, there exists such a service. We felt we could perhaps augment
this and offer something specific for our students and staff here in Dahlonega.
-
Recommendation 3: dissolve the current committee and offer this
as a project.
This
will be to provide referral service to NGC community, develop our own resources,
or both. Students seem to approve as project. Dr. Weidmann asks
about specifics on the offer of Bearinger. Mann clarified that the
20 spaces are available, spread out over the age group. Noel Campbell
lauded the committee’s report and pointed out liability of the college
otherwise. Woods pointed out, as a point of order, that we only need to
approve the report, not its recommendations. Friedman asked why
the report is marked as a draft,
and moved to endorse it. Seconded by Fuller,
the motion carried.
Announcements and Adjournment:
Barry
Friedman mentioned the deadlines to RSVP to upcoming banquets, and
beseeched attendees to please get their money in. In lieu of further announcements,
Woods adjourned the meeting at 1:31 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
D. Brian Mann, Secretary, and Elizabeth Combier, incoming Secretary,
NGCSU Faculty Senate